主站 nginx + web.py + mysql blog nginx + php-fpm + mysql wiki nginx + php-fpm + mysql 感觉主机内存有点吃不消，该去机房增加内存了

server { listen 80; server_name blog.yeefe.com; access_log logs/blog.access.log; location ~* ^.+\.(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js)$ { root /home/blog; rewrite ^/.*(/wp-admin/.*\.(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js))$ $1 last; rewrite ^/.*(/wp-includes/.*\.(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js))$ $1 last; rewrite ^/.*(/wp-content/themes/.*\.(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js))$ $1 last; rewrite ^/.*(/wp-content/.*\.(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js))$ $1 last; rewrite ^.*/files/(.*(html|jpg|jpeg|gif|png|ico|css|zip|tgz|gz|rar|bz2|doc|xls|exe|pdf|ppt|txt|tar|mid|midi|wav|bmp|rtf|js))$ /wp-content/blogs.php?file=$1 last; expires 10d; break; } location / { root /home/blog; index index.php; if (!-e $request_filename) { rewrite ^.+?(/wp-.*) $1 last; rewrite ^.+?(/.*\.php)$ $1 last; rewrite ^(.+)$ /index.php?q=$1 last; break; } location ~ \.php?$ { rewrite ^/.*(/wp-.*/.*.php)$ $1; include fastcgi.conf; fastcgi_pass  127.0.0.1:9000; fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME /home/blog$fastcgi_script_name; fastcgi_index index.php; } location = /50x.html { root /opt/nginx/html; } } }

元宵是中国传统的全家团圆的日子，而对于我来说，还有另一份值得特别记忆的意义，每年的元宵节是苗苗的生日。 当你的窗外爆竹声声之际，我亦正为苗苗送上为父的祝福。 三岁了，苗苗，爸爸祝你来年健康成长，美丽聪慧，顺利度过你第一个小小叛逆期。 最近，苗苗似乎步入她第一个叛逆期，具体表现为：

• 假装听不见

例如：在电视时间，当她近距离（2米内）观看电视超过2分钟，我们会及时劝阻。之前她总是能及时纠正自己的行为，但现在（自从2岁10个月起）她往往表现出一副假装没听到的模样，即使我们反复使用语言并加重语气，她仍旧不理不睬，一意孤行的对放纵自己的行为。 为什么我们会作出她是故意表现出一副假装没听到的模样，因为当我们在走到她面前时，她往往有下列举动：1故意避开你的眼睛，把头撇向一边；2对着你傻笑，如果你严厉批评的话她会傻笑的更为厉害；3当你走近她并准备对她的行为采取干涉行动的时候，她会在你抓住她的一刹那突然跑开，有时候还伴随着咯咯的笑，所以我们判断她是采取回避、拖延的方式来对付我们试图对她不正确的行为的干预和矫正。

• 撒无赖

当我们对上述行为采取主动干预的行为之后，她往往会顺势往地上一趟打滚，当我们试图把她拉起来时，她会像块软不拉及的海蜇皮似的，站也不是，坐也不是，躺也不是，拉倒我们身边她就倒在你身上，放手的话她就直接躺在地上，放她到沙发上，她就举大鼎头朝下，脚朝上的斜靠在沙发背上。 这是我们会采取两种策略：

1. 严肃的教育。我们会表情刚毅的让她站直靠在墙上，然后严厉的摆事实讲道理的就事论事。
2. 冷处理。等她发泄完了自己的情绪之后再和她摆事实讲道理的就事论事。

• 攻击性语言和动作

有时候当我们劝阻时，她除了使用海蜇皮战略外，还会伴有尖叫、吐口水、使用拳头敲打以及讲“打死你”。

又一个基于地理信息服务的microblog，有什么用处？只是在分割用户群。人来疯 http://www.bedo.cn/index.php

Internet Storm Center的研究人员写了一个脚本，从Twitpic上收集了15,291幅照片，分析它们的EXIF数据。 现代手机通常都带有摄像头和GPS，即使没有GPS，信号塔也能用于确定手机的方位。照片格式的EXIF标签便储存了此类信息。
虽然从照片中挖据EXIF数据并不新鲜，但那些公开手机照片的人恐怕没有多少知道照片内包含的信息。研究人员发现，大约有10000幅照片包含了基本的EXIF数据，如照片分辨率和相机方位；5247幅照片包含了照相机型号；399幅照片包含了照片拍摄时照相机所在位置；102幅照片中包含了拍摄者的名字；iPhone手机拍摄的照片包含的EXIF信息最为丰富（示例），它甚至包含了加速计移动数据和罗盘指示方向数据。

巴别塔上的雇工写道 "微软宣布在Outlook 2010中增加一组名为Outlook Social Connector的功能，能够给用户提供社交网络的体验。 和前不久Google推出Buzz利用了Gmail用户中的关系网络类似，Outlook Social Connector也是利用电子邮件中隐藏的社会关系网络，但是要说微软借此向Twitter、Facebook等社交网络靠拢尚为时过早，因为Outlook Social Connector更多的是一个社交网络软件，而不是社交网络服务，主要面对的也是企业中的关系网。虽然Outlook Social Connector也可与其他社交网络连接，但是我想从企业的角度来说，更希望员工不要把职业关系和自己的好友混在一起。"

2月16日，美国专利和商标局向Google授予了“基于文档访问权限的不同用户界面”专利，专利号7664751描述了搜索巨人的发明：根据用户的地理位置和拥有的文档访问权限，限制互联网内容访问。 Google要当ISP，提供高速光纤网络 Google宣布了在美国的人口密集地区（有5万到50万用户）建造超高速光纤宽带网络的计划。 Google计划以富有竞争力的价格向用户提供1Gb/s的光纤到户接入。Google的宽带网络接入将是开放式的，允许竞争对手使用它的网络，以保证用户有其它选择。Google的全球产品经理Minnie Ingersoll和James Kelly称，超高速互联网接入将能实现远程医疗诊断，5分钟内下载完高清电影，观看3D的实时大学课程视频。美国的地方政府现在可以登记参与该计划的测试。

德国总统签署屏蔽儿童色情法案 Feb 18, 2010 10:19 AM司法部长Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger表示一项新的协议正在达成。新协议将删除儿童色情网页而不是屏蔽之。 法国将在下周投票是否实行网络过滤 Feb 12, 2010 (5 days ago)法国议会立法议员将于下周二投票是否实行网络过滤，这项提案是新的安全法案的一部分，目的是阻止儿童色情。然而，一旦实行了互联网过滤，政府可能利用它去审查其它的让它感到不爽的内容。 另外一条相关消息：Google拒绝了澳大利亚内容分级机构OFLC提出的过滤Youtube视频内容的要求，称Youtube有自己的内容政策，但不会作出保证去删除YouTube上所有被拒绝分类的内容（澳大利亚的拒绝分类内容即R18+）。 意大利法庭裁决ISP必须屏蔽海盗湾 Feb 11, 2010 (6 days ago) 一家意大利法庭再次裁定，全国的ISP必须屏蔽访问臭名昭著的BT Tracker网站海盗湾（The Pirate Bay），让数百万用户从此远离全世界最受欢迎的网站之一。 2008年意大利法院首次作出要求ISP屏蔽海盗湾的裁决，但海盗湾随后对此提起了上诉。Bergamo法院否决了原判决，认为外国网站不能因为涉嫌侵犯版权而遭屏蔽，因此屏蔽被临时取消了。然而，几周前意大利最高法院对此案进行了评审，裁定ISP必须强制屏蔽BitTorren网站，即使该网站位于意大利境外。根据意大利最高法院的裁决，网站提供连接到受版权保护内容的torrent将被认为是在从事犯罪活动。

[caption id="attachment_1956" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="2010 春节"][/caption]
虎年～

新春快乐！

万事如意！

Happy New Year

为了配合Google全新推出的社交化服务Buzz，Google在2010/2/10在其将他们的Google Map升级到了4.0的版本。

在现实生活和虚拟网络合二为一下，当社会关系越发MEWE化（以个人为中心，以社区为中心）的当下，那些直接影响我们的关键因素包括：技术、组织以及价值观的变化将对我们自身的思考存在那些影响，其中哪些有将是成为真正的big thinking？ 如下我总结了一些：

• 如何在自己参加（有关）纵横交错的社区/圈子之间同步信息？
• 如何在屏幕（手机/电脑）前，能直观的发现自己的信息更新？例如地理信息；日程表信息；朋友愿意分享的信息
• 信息的同步和更新如何缩短从大脑思考到手输出的时间？请注意：语言对思考的表达也是有限的
• 技术将如何填补由于技术本身造成的社会关系的粒化的所引发的人际关系淡漠的鸿沟？
• 社会关系淡漠将诱发组织机构的重组和优化，由此对参与组织的个人输出的不确定性又将如和平衡？对社会的不稳定性又将如何面对？
• ......

待续中

Gmail里都已经出现了Buzz，现在上的朋友是在太少了，什么时候能直接同步twitter上面的follower/ing就完美了。 在商业价值上，任何水平化社区的工具都将很难有所建树。例外是垄断...... 在手机上使用Google Buzz：

• 可以看到你周围的更新
• 发布更新，自动附带上你的位置信息
• 随时看到好友的更新
• 可以选择喜欢哪个更新，或是进行评论
• Google Maps新增一个Buzz图层
• 可以在Place Page里看到这个位置的人们发的更新
• 点击google.com右上角的Buzz图标也可直接发布更新
• 甚至可以直接通过语音来发布更新

Google Buzz：

• 不需要设置。一切都与你的Gmail整合了
• 自己决定分享给全世界还是只针对好友
• 照片浏览。直接可以看到每个更新里的图片预览，点击即可全屏查看，支持所有流行的照片在线服务，比如Flickr和Picasa
• 与twitter、Picasa、Flickr、Google Reader和YouTube等网站整合在一起（这5个哥们好像只有GR可以用，感觉现在也命悬一线了有点……）
• 实时看到好友的更新
• 只看到你感兴趣的更新。Buzz会根据你的兴趣过滤出你感兴趣的更新内容，帮助你过滤掉不喜欢的内容,

手机Buzz的支持情况：

• buzz.google.com：支持Android、iPhone，黑莓、Windows Mobile和S60的支持稍后
• Google Maps应用程序里的Buzz图层：支持Android、iPhone、Windows Mobile和S60，黑莓的支持稍后
• Place Page里的Buzz页面：支持Android、iPhone，无计划支持其它手机

2010年1月27日，美国作家杰罗姆-大卫-塞林格去世，享年91岁。

原文地址：http://www.webdesignerwall.com/trends/47-amazing-css3-animation-demos/

CSS3 Clock With jQuery

Analogue Clock

3D Cube That Rotates Using Arrow Keys

Multiple 3D Cubes (Slide In/Out)

CSS3 Accordion

Auto-Scrolling Parallax

Isocube

Image Gallery

Matrix

7 Javascript-effect Alternatives Using CSS3

Image Hover Effects

Turning Coke Can (Control With Scrollbar)

3D Meninas

Polaroid Gallery

Space

Note: this one is graphic intense and takes a while to load, but the result is crazy!

Mac Dock

Drop-In Modals

Sliding Vinyl

Zooming Polaroids

Animated Rocket

Poster Circle

Morphing Cubes

Falling Leaves

Animated Polaroid Gallery

Spotlight Cast Shadow

Colorful Clock

Lightbox Gallery (Draggable)

Elastic Thumbnail Menu

Coverflow

Snowflakes

jQuery DJ Hero

Dynamic Stacking Cards

Another Image Gallery

Snow Stack (Control With Arrow Keys)

Animated Pricing Column

Slick jQuery Menu

CSS3

CSS Tabs Without Javascript

Tab Menus Without Javascript

SVG Fisheye Menu

Dynamic Presentation Without Flash

Rotating Gallery

Dropdown Menu

Another Fisheye

Frame-by-Frame Animation (Hover to Play)

Another Accordion

AT-AT Walker (No Flash or Javascript)

  Editor’s note: This is the fourth in a series of posts by guest writer Ashkan Karbasfrooshan.Previously, he wrote about the State of Online Video, 12 Surprising Things Holding Back Online Video Advertising, and Context is King: How Videos Are Found And Consumed Online.  In part 4 today, he examines where he thinks the sweet spot is for making money in onljne video. Karbasfrooshan is the founder and CEO of WatchMojo. In Search of Profits Ten years ago, web companies didn’t generate much revenue.   These days, web companies are some of the most profitable around.  Online video is where the Web was ten years ago: in investment mode as video companies that are generating high revenue are not necessarily the most profitable. Are those companies suffering low margins because they’re investing in the future or are they fundamentally lower-margin businesses? Ad Networks Are Low Margin Businesses This week, video ad network Brightroll raised $10 million from Scale Venture Partners.  Ad networks aggregate audiences and sell ads to marketers, sharing the proceeds with publishers/producers.  Scale’s Rob Theis’ argues: “the most strategic Internet investments are those that compete not with other Internet businesses, but with the much larger amount of money still being spent offline.” Brightroll’s CEO Tod Sacerdoti added: “I think by this time next year the majority of the top five to ten video properties by any measure will be aggregator networks.  The best example for this is display advertising.”  Indeed, networks have an unmatched ability to scale but can also crash to the ground awfully fast. The low margin is the least of their problems; differentiation and defensibility are.  Blue Lithium and Right Media hit jackpots by selling to Yahoo!  But those who didn’t sell (Tribal Fusion, Valueclick) suddenly found themselves under pressure from search advertising on performance and video on branding. Content Networks Have Little Differentiation Similarly, aggregators gather videos from content providers, sharing ad revenues.  iFilm (sold to Viacom, renamed Spike), Guba, Grouper (sold to SONY, renamed Crackle), Revver, YouTube (sold to Google), Veoh, DailyMotion, Metacafe, Viddler, blip.tv, are all vying for content, audiences and dollars. YouTube is master of this domain.  Hulu is giving YouTube a run for its money, but the business model is anything but certain and its long term exit strategy is murky (Disney, News Corp. and NBC Universal/Comcast are shareholders but also competitors). Ultimately, ad and content networks operate in a high-risk, winner-take-all game.   For publishers, it’s a lower risk world.  Consider the two acquisitions News Corp. made in 2005: Rupert Murdoch paid more for IGN ($650M) than for MySpace ($580 million), but MySpace’s subsequent growth made him look like a genius (for a while).  Today, MySpace is searching for its raison d’etre while IGN treks along as an unstoppable force in its sphere. The Myth of Hyper Distribution? In online video, producers are agnostic to distribution channel or platform.  To reduce risk, they diversify distribution, but the jury’s out on whether hyper distribution bears fruit.  Hyper distribution refers to syndicating one’s content as broadly as possible with little or no restrictions. When it comes to generating revenues, is hyper-distribution wise?  Not according to Chris Pirillo, a prosumer video producer who leverages video to promote his empire but only counts YouTube as a commercial platform: “YouTube offers the largest audiences and generates most the revenue.  If you’re not YouTube, you have challenges in creating value for content producers”.  If that changes, look out for Freewheel, which according to CEO Doug Knopper allows “media companies and content owners to be able to monetize their video libraries across multiple channels and devices”. Advertisers Follow Audiences… Ex-Disney CEO Michael Eisner doesn’t pretend to know how the industry is going to play out, but he’s got no doubts what the end result will be: “I don’t know if the growth in content made for the Internet will be evolutionary or revolutionary, but it can’t not happen: a death march has been going on for other media who are in trouble because there is a more efficient way to share content around the world with the Internet.” Business Models Take Time to Develop Eisner made his fortune in television.  One VC who’s made his online has another opinion.  In Fred Wilson’s influential 2005 post “The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed)”, he suggests to: 1 – Microchunk it – Reduce the content to its simplest form. 2 – Free it – Put it out there without walls around it or strings on it. 3 – Syndicate it – Let anyone take it and run with it. 4 – Monetize it – Put the monetization and tracking systems into the microchunk. In theory, in the future when video streams monetize the way search queries have (whereby a search query is always associated with some kind of paid listing) then perhaps Wilson’s thesis will prove right.  But in practice, at least in the five years that have passed since the post, it’s been a recipe for financial disaster. Hyper distribution is great for promotional purposes but not necessarily for commercial purposes.  Marketers do pay more attention as an audience grows, but they also pay a premium for scarcity and exclusivity. This is the fundamental conundrum facing new media producers who rely on hyper-distribution to build brands and audiences but who weaken their pricing power and ability to secure guaranteed dollars by giving away their videos.  This can work if you can build ad-supported businesses, but that takes time and money. Today, a few new media producers have managed to build ad-supported businesses, namely Revision3 and Next New Networks.  But between the two, they have raised over $30 million in venture capital.  Most producers don’t have that luxury.  For those others, I recommend creating content that other media companies will pay for, to buy them enough time to build a syndication business and eventually, a fully ad-supported business which commands the large ad dollars. An imperfect but useful analogy I use is the banking model, where retail, corporate and investment banking fees can create a large business. This diversified strategy provides:

• a safe income stream:  licensing, like retail banking, provides a recurring and non-volatile revenue base.
• a growth business: syndication, like corporate banking, requires other companies in the ecosystem to do well.  This can provide higher CPM rates by placing content in the right context.
• a wildly lucrative stream: advertising, like investment banking, takes time to develop, is speculative and seasonal, and risks drying up abruptly.  Notice how advertising revenue spikes each fourth quarter, for example.

The reason why I place content producers in the highest Profitability circle over time  in the first chart above is because only they can build such a business.  (The Profitability Index represented in the chart takes into account operating margins and total return on investment, including likelihood of a liquidity event).  And, yes, I am completely biased, since this is the kind of business I am trying to build with WatchMojo.  Aggregators and networks are solely advertising based businesses; just ask YouTube who generated $10,000 in a paid model test, even though it can generate billions in simpler ways.  Video advertising will be a bigger business, but not necessarily a higher-margin business. Video will be Everywhere: on all Websites Video on the Web is no longer just about entertainment.  It is also about marketing, instruction, and conveying information of all kinds.

• Content bellwether Wikipedia announced it will be rolling out videos soon enough.
• e-Commerce leader Zappos encourages users to submit their video experiences which increase sales 6% to 30%.  In 2010, it will create 50,000 videos.
• It won’t be long before organizations feature their accountants, lawyers, management, VCs in videos too.

Video will be Everywhere: in Ads Videos won’t simply be on all websites; video ads will converge with rich media and display banners.  Publishers and ad networks will swap out low yield ad placements for videos that sell at a premium.  Rupert Murdoch is right to say that there isn’t enough advertising to make all publishing online profitable, but if you insert a video-enabled ad where a display banner exists today, maybe it will become more profitable, as video rates tend to generate a tenfold premium over display banners.  Of course, the flip side of that argument is that if video ad inventory lost all scarcity as display banners have, then it rates would also see a steep drop. Video is the Anti-Search Google’s dominance of the Web today stems from a perfect storm.  Search benefitted from low expectations.   Whereas Google’s competitors threw in the towel to focus on portaldom (or outright handed them the business), online video companies’ war chests seemingly have no bottom as they wage the war for the online audience. With YouTube being a unit of Google, it’s hard to compete being a pure video aggregator.  Those who have tried are flailing badly.  Yet video’s expectations have always been high and will only get higher. History Repeats Itself Video will follow search in two ways though. Search is software and Google is the only successful ad-supported technology company.  Video is media, which has a natural disposition to embrace ad-supported models.  As such, advertising will monetize video streams.  In fact, as large ad agencies and marketers shift online, they’ll embrace branding campaigns and push video advertising could eventually top search advertising.  Once that starts, online advertising will surpass television, it’s already happened in the UK. Search for The Leading Ad Format Everyone agrees that video advertising will be huge but what will the prevailing ad format be? Stakeholders are obsessed with finding the ad format likely to follow television’s 30-second ad spot and search’s paid listings. What might lead the way? Pre-rolls are the equivalent of pop-ups (and mid/post rolls the equivalent of pop-unders) in that users hate them, but unlike pop-ups, I actually think pre-rolls won’t disappear, mainly because

• They’re the most in-demand ad format (according to Brightroll CEO Tod Sacerdoti)
• It is easier to include a pre-roll when you’re syndicating to other websites and platforms (says blip.tv co-founder Dina Kaplan)
• But largely because they’ll get more user-friendly: the 30-second ad will make way for 5-10 second interactive pre-rolls (SpotXchange CEO Michael Shehan).

However, there will always be properties which will forego pre-roll revenue to improve the user experience in order to build audiences, and all else being equal users will migrate to those sites.  So I’m not sure the pre-roll will remain all that ubiquitous.  The other problem with pre-rolls is lack of attention.  When a pre-roll starts, I tune out and look for my headphones or go grab a coffee. That’s why I like the contextual display banner (and not necessarily the companion banner).  A companion banner comes bundled with the video pre-roll, but sits alongside the video  A contextual banner comes without the pre-roll.  Whereas most banners disappear quickly next to text with one downward scroll of the mouse, alongside a video player, that banner becomes quite valuable and top-of-mind since people are just staring at the video. We’ve also seen the rise (and fall) of overlays, which is basically an expanded Picture-in-Picture (PIP) format; we know how that fared. Of course, content producers are also salivating over branded content (more than product integration and product placement, the brand becomes central to the story) or outright sponsorships. Finally, there’s the Web’s favorite offspring: the viral video.  Viral video is not an ad format, of course, but it is not quite branded content nor is it supported by ads.  As these become more common, achieving success with content alone becomes a sure-fire recipe for failure.  All content will need to be supported by a media buy or some kind of promotional push.  After all, on TV you spend millions creating an ad but you need to buy media spots to promote it.  It’s not going to be that different online.  Yes, it’s a meritocracy, but it’s a loud, cluttered one. KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid There won’t be a single dominant ad format but the holy grail will prove simpler than expected.  It always does. Remember Don Lapre’s infomercials?  He would go on and on about placing “Tiny Classified Ads” in newspapers.  I never thought much of those ads until Google’s adoption of (essentially) little text ads next to search results led to their explosive growth. Sometimes in business, the solution is simpler than you can imagine.

小蓓前几天晚上问我：你前几天去银行的时候和苗苗到底说了什么？

我一脸疑惑回答道：啊呀，我说的是在太多了，怎么了？

下午苗苗要让我给你买糖吃，我说妈妈身上忘记带钱了，等晚上再说。小蓓一脸坏笑的问我：你知道她接着回答了我什么？

回答什么？我蛮有兴致的问道

她回答我，妈妈，没带钱没关系的，只要和机器做好朋友就行了。小蓓边说边笑的不行了

哦，我想起来了，我也笑的不行：对对对，那天他看我在ATM前取钱，她问我在干什么，我回答她：爸爸和机器在交朋友啊，当我们成为好朋友之后，机器就会吐出钱来了呀。

敢情她用在小蓓的身上了。

下午陪苗苗一起泡澡，她指着我腿上的毛说：爸爸，这是什么呀？好长啊。我说不好意思的反问：苗苗，你说这是什么呀？

过了一会儿，她边把水泼在我脸上边说：爸爸我知道了，这是脚上长头发了。

晚上，小蓓在她床边讲故事，说完了海绵宝宝之后，她煞有介事的说：妈妈我也给你讲一个故事，好吗？小蓓点头示意。苗苗说：妈妈我给你讲一个腿上长了什么的故事。小蓓一脸迷惑的问：长了什么呀？你猜猜看呀？苗苗一本正经的回答。

正当小蓓一头雾水，苗苗把小腿从被子里伸了出来说：你看啊，长了什么呀？小蓓看了半天没瞧出什么异样，于是问道：长了什么呢？

长了头发呀～苗苗指着自己腿上的汗毛说：长了和爸爸一样的头发呀。

用法说明：

1. 把下载到的压缩包解压，然后为 StandaloneStack.exe 创建个快捷方式或者发送到桌面快捷方式。 
2. 右击快捷方式，选择“属性”，然后在目标后面加上个参数：[空格]Appinn（请把[空格]替换为真实的空格），或者是你的名字，支持中文。比如我这里这样设置： F:\standalonestack\StandaloneStack.exe sfufoet  小提示：这个参数的好处就是，可以建立无限多个快捷方式，并设置为含有不同快捷方式的文件夹：游戏、软件等等。
3. 第一次运行会出现设置对话框，设置好文件夹（Folder）。
   
   Sort by 是图标排序；Mode 是弹出效果，有两种效果（fan 效果如右图，Grid 效果见下图，Automatic 是根据文件多少自动选择效果。）
   
4. 最后丢到桌面或者快速启动栏。
5. 按住 Ctrl 运行 StandaloneStack 会出现配置界面。

继首届深圳城市建筑双年展采用了独立策展人负责制以来，先后聘请了国际著名华人建筑师张永和教授、马清运先生以及跨领域文化实践者欧宁先生担任总策展人，策划前三届双年展，并分别以“城市开门”、“城市再生”、“城市动员”作为展览主题，重点围绕深圳进行 “城市与城市化”的探讨，通过展览展示研究城市建设及生活的策略和成果。三届深圳双年展的成功举办，体现了与深圳特区创办建设一脉相传的开放态度、创新精神和探索勇气；为深圳初步构建了一个国际艺术交流的平台，探索了建立按国际惯例运作、具备国际水平的艺术展览制度的可能；为深圳乃至当代艺术中提供了一个新的品种；为打造深圳的文化品牌、提升城市的文化竞争力做了有益的尝试。

双城双年展将延续和进一步强化“城市与城市化”这一固定主题方向，公开向社会各界征询“2011双城双年展”策展人。根据历届的实际操作经验，本届策展人的资格考查标准主要包括：1、学术界与社会间的成就和影响力；2、专业创新能力；3、国内外策展经验；4、丰富综合资源，如调动高端专业人员的能力，国内外媒体关系等。

深圳城市\建筑双年展组委会诚挚邀请有识之士的参与，期待您对“2011双城双年展”提出独特的看法，表达您的策展应征意向，为市民带来和让人期待的策展构想。应征方法具体如下：

（1） 即日起登陆“深圳双年展”网站www.szhkbiennale.org,下载《2011双城双年展策展应征回复函》，或联系双年展组委会办公室索取相关资料。
（2） 1月11日前向本组委会提交《征询回复函》和策展草案。
（3） 1月23日前由深圳双年展学术委员会审议意见，提交组委会确定并在2009双城双年展闭幕式上宣布征询结果。

详细材料和展览咨询请联系：
深圳城市\建筑双年展组委会办公室
联系人：孔雁

电话：+86-755-83953209 传真：+86-755-83953210
征询专用邮箱：2011szhkbiennale@gmail.com