Archive for the ‘social media’ Category

谷歌退出大陆 要小心的是大家

星期六, 03月 27th, 2010

有人問,對于Google的部分服務退出大陸,你會有什么看法?

呵呵,首先容我矯情下先:人往往是有想法,沒辦法。雙好了,

發生在我們身邊的貌似是一家引領21世紀互聯網風潮的全球化的納斯達克上市的社會化的新媒體IT公司扮演這唐吉珂德去挑戰一個正越發悻悻相容的大國風車的故事,我的想法匯報如下:

  1. Google確實有“不作惡”的價值觀。但是,自2004年8月19日起,Google就成為一家上市公司。作為一家上市的企業,在制定商業發展戰略時,考慮退不退出某個市場(某個用戶數不斷增長的市場)所要考慮的不只是價值觀、創始人兒時的不良記憶,甚至是別有用心的要“干涉別國/地區的內政”,而更多考慮的該是考慮持有其股票的股東的利益。Google的董事會肯定不是白癡,想必已經反復深思熟慮過多次。大家沒必要將Google無線神話。
  2.  

  3. 自2008年9月起,我國政府已經緩過氣來,并以絕對今非昔比般的不是吃素(太多敏感史實已經佐證)的干活姿態笑迎西方列強。在西方資本主義還沒回過氣,我們以處于來開空前絕后的盛世序幕的當下,敢與承擔冒天下之大不韙的責任,并且一派心平氣和對全球放話:Google離不離開是Google自己的決定!就從這點看來,想必我國在面對洪水猛獸的互聯網問題上,應該已處于絕對的收官之勢。所謂:没有三把神沙,不敢倒反西歧。講的就是這個意思。大家要提高警惕!
  4.  

  5. 由以上2點,不難分析出:Google退守香港是更多的可能是為了避免造成更嚴重的雙輸博弈局面,雙方相互妥協的不得已而為之的較優選項。兩害取其輕說的就是這個。
  6.  

  7. 想必大家都明白,所謂的商業活動是沒有對錯,是非,只有短暫的“和、分”之別以測試對方的底線。因為參與經濟活動的絕大多數個體都是非理性的。
  8.  

此為第1000篇blog。

wangxiaofeicn@gmail.com

wangxiaofeicn@hotmail.com

twitter:yeefe

『转』How To Make Money In Online Video

星期一, 02月 8th, 2010

 

Editor’s note: This is the fourth in a series of posts by guest writer Ashkan Karbasfrooshan.Previously, he wrote about the State of Online Video, 12 Surprising Things Holding Back Online Video Advertising, and Context is King: How Videos Are Found And Consumed Online.  In part 4 today, he examines where he thinks the sweet spot is for making money in onljne video. Karbasfrooshan is the founder and CEO of WatchMojo.

In Search of Profits

Ten years ago, web companies didn’t generate much revenue.   These days, web companies are some of the most profitable around.  Online video is where the Web was ten years ago: in investment mode as video companies that are generating high revenue are not necessarily the most profitable.

Are those companies suffering low margins because they’re investing in the future or are they fundamentally lower-margin businesses?

Ad Networks Are Low Margin Businesses

This week, video ad network Brightroll raised $10 million from Scale Venture Partners.  Ad networks aggregate audiences and sell ads to marketers, sharing the proceeds with publishers/producers.  Scale’s Rob Theis’ argues: “the most strategic Internet investments are those that compete not with other Internet businesses, but with the much larger amount of money still being spent offline.”

Brightroll’s CEO Tod Sacerdoti added: “I think by this time next year the majority of the top five to ten video properties by any measure will be aggregator networks.  The best example for this is display advertising.”  Indeed, networks have an unmatched ability to scale but can also crash to the ground awfully fast.

The low margin is the least of their problems; differentiation and defensibility are.  Blue Lithium and Right Media hit jackpots by selling to Yahoo!  But those who didn’t sell (Tribal Fusion, Valueclick) suddenly found themselves under pressure from search advertising on performance and video on branding.

Content Networks Have Little Differentiation

Similarly, aggregators gather videos from content providers, sharing ad revenues.  iFilm (sold to Viacom, renamed Spike), Guba, Grouper (sold to SONY, renamed Crackle), Revver, YouTube (sold to Google), Veoh, DailyMotion, Metacafe, Viddler, blip.tv, are all vying for content, audiences and dollars.

YouTube is master of this domain.  Hulu is giving YouTube a run for its money, but the business model is anything but certain and its long term exit strategy is murky (Disney, News Corp. and NBC Universal/Comcast are shareholders but also competitors).

Ultimately, ad and content networks operate in a high-risk, winner-take-all game.   For publishers, it’s a lower risk world.  Consider the two acquisitions News Corp. made in 2005: Rupert Murdoch paid more for IGN ($650M) than for MySpace ($580 million), but MySpace’s subsequent growth made him look like a genius (for a while).  Today, MySpace is searching for its raison d’etre while IGN treks along as an unstoppable force in its sphere.

The Myth of Hyper Distribution?

In online video, producers are agnostic to distribution channel or platform.  To reduce risk, they diversify distribution, but the jury’s out on whether hyper distribution bears fruit.  Hyper distribution refers to syndicating one’s content as broadly as possible with little or no restrictions.

When it comes to generating revenues, is hyper-distribution wise?  Not according to Chris Pirillo, a prosumer video producer who leverages video to promote his empire but only counts YouTube as a commercial platform: “YouTube offers the largest audiences and generates most the revenue.  If you’re not YouTube, you have challenges in creating value for content producers”.  If that changes, look out for Freewheel, which according to CEO Doug Knopper allows “media companies and content owners to be able to monetize their video libraries across multiple channels and devices”.

Advertisers Follow Audiences…

Ex-Disney CEO Michael Eisner doesn’t pretend to know how the industry is going to play out, but he’s got no doubts what the end result will be: “I don’t know if the growth in content made for the Internet will be evolutionary or revolutionary, but it can’t not happen: a death march has been going on for other media who are in trouble because there is a more efficient way to share content around the world with the Internet.”

Business Models Take Time to Develop

Eisner made his fortune in television.  One VC who’s made his online has another opinion.  In Fred Wilson’s influential 2005 post “The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed)”, he suggests to:

1 – Microchunk it – Reduce the content to its simplest form.
2 – Free it – Put it out there without walls around it or strings on it.
3 – Syndicate it – Let anyone take it and run with it.
4 – Monetize it – Put the monetization and tracking systems into the microchunk.

In theory, in the future when video streams monetize the way search queries have (whereby a search query is always associated with some kind of paid listing) then perhaps Wilson’s thesis will prove right.  But in practice, at least in the five years that have passed since the post, it’s been a recipe for financial disaster.

Hyper distribution is great for promotional purposes but not necessarily for commercial purposes.  Marketers do pay more attention as an audience grows, but they also pay a premium for scarcity and exclusivity.

This is the fundamental conundrum facing new media producers who rely on hyper-distribution to build brands and audiences but who weaken their pricing power and ability to secure guaranteed dollars by giving away their videos.  This can work if you can build ad-supported businesses, but that takes time and money.

Today, a few new media producers have managed to build ad-supported businesses, namely Revision3 and Next New Networks.  But between the two, they have raised over $30 million in venture capital.  Most producers don’t have that luxury.  For those others, I recommend creating content that other media companies will pay for, to buy them enough time to build a syndication business and eventually, a fully ad-supported business which commands the large ad dollars.

An imperfect but useful analogy I use is the banking model, where retail, corporate and investment banking fees can create a large business.

This diversified strategy provides:

  • a safe income stream:  licensing, like retail banking, provides a recurring and non-volatile revenue base.
  • a growth business: syndication, like corporate banking, requires other companies in the ecosystem to do well.  This can provide higher CPM rates by placing content in the right context.
  • a wildly lucrative stream: advertising, like investment banking, takes time to develop, is speculative and seasonal, and risks drying up abruptly.  Notice how advertising revenue spikes each fourth quarter, for example.

The reason why I place content producers in the highest Profitability circle over time  in the first chart above is because only they can build such a business.  (The Profitability Index represented in the chart takes into account operating margins and total return on investment, including likelihood of a liquidity event).  And, yes, I am completely biased, since this is the kind of business I am trying to build with WatchMojo.  Aggregators and networks are solely advertising based businesses; just ask YouTube who generated $10,000 in a paid model test, even though it can generate billions in simpler ways.  Video advertising will be a bigger business, but not necessarily a higher-margin business.

Video will be Everywhere: on all Websites

Video on the Web is no longer just about entertainment.  It is also about marketing, instruction, and conveying information of all kinds.

  • Content bellwether Wikipedia announced it will be rolling out videos soon enough.
  • e-Commerce leader Zappos encourages users to submit their video experiences which increase sales 6% to 30%.  In 2010, it will create 50,000 videos.
  • It won’t be long before organizations feature their accountants, lawyers, management, VCs in videos too.

Video will be Everywhere: in Ads

Videos won’t simply be on all websites; video ads will converge with rich media and display banners.  Publishers and ad networks will swap out low yield ad placements for videos that sell at a premium.  Rupert Murdoch is right to say that there isn’t enough advertising to make all publishing online profitable, but if you insert a video-enabled ad where a display banner exists today, maybe it will become more profitable, as video rates tend to generate a tenfold premium over display banners.  Of course, the flip side of that argument is that if video ad inventory lost all scarcity as display banners have, then it rates would also see a steep drop.

Video is the Anti-Search

Google’s dominance of the Web today stems from a perfect storm.  Search benefitted from low expectations.   Whereas Google’s competitors threw in the towel to focus on portaldom (or outright handed them the business), online video companies’ war chests seemingly have no bottom as they wage the war for the online audience.

With YouTube being a unit of Google, it’s hard to compete being a pure video aggregator.  Those who have tried are flailing badly.  Yet video’s expectations have always been high and will only get higher.

History Repeats Itself

Video will follow search in two ways though.

Search is software and Google is the only successful ad-supported technology company.  Video is media, which has a natural disposition to embrace ad-supported models.  As such, advertising will monetize video streams.  In fact, as large ad agencies and marketers shift online, they’ll embrace branding campaigns and push video advertising could eventually top search advertising.  Once that starts, online advertising will surpass television, it’s already happened in the UK.

Search for The Leading Ad Format

Everyone agrees that video advertising will be huge but what will the prevailing ad format be?

Stakeholders are obsessed with finding the ad format likely to follow television’s 30-second ad spot and search’s paid listings.

What might lead the way?

Pre-rolls are the equivalent of pop-ups (and mid/post rolls the equivalent of pop-unders) in that users hate them, but unlike pop-ups, I actually think pre-rolls won’t disappear, mainly because

  • They’re the most in-demand ad format (according to Brightroll CEO Tod Sacerdoti)
  • It is easier to include a pre-roll when you’re syndicating to other websites and platforms (says blip.tv co-founder Dina Kaplan)
  • But largely because they’ll get more user-friendly: the 30-second ad will make way for 5-10 second interactive pre-rolls (SpotXchange CEO Michael Shehan).

However, there will always be properties which will forego pre-roll revenue to improve the user experience in order to build audiences, and all else being equal users will migrate to those sites.  So I’m not sure the pre-roll will remain all that ubiquitous.  The other problem with pre-rolls is lack of attention.  When a pre-roll starts, I tune out and look for my headphones or go grab a coffee.

That’s why I like the contextual display banner (and not necessarily the companion banner).  A companion banner comes bundled with the video pre-roll, but sits alongside the video  A contextual banner comes without the pre-roll.  Whereas most banners disappear quickly next to text with one downward scroll of the mouse, alongside a video player, that banner becomes quite valuable and top-of-mind since people are just staring at the video.

We’ve also seen the rise (and fall) of overlays, which is basically an expanded Picture-in-Picture (PIP) format; we know how that fared.

Of course, content producers are also salivating over branded content (more than product integration and product placement, the brand becomes central to the story) or outright sponsorships.

Finally, there’s the Web’s favorite offspring: the viral video.  Viral video is not an ad format, of course, but it is not quite branded content nor is it supported by ads.  As these become more common, achieving success with content alone becomes a sure-fire recipe for failure.  All content will need to be supported by a media buy or some kind of promotional push.  After all, on TV you spend millions creating an ad but you need to buy media spots to promote it.  It’s not going to be that different online.  Yes, it’s a meritocracy, but it’s a loud, cluttered one.

KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid

There won’t be a single dominant ad format but the holy grail will prove simpler than expected.  It always does.

Remember Don Lapre’s infomercials?  He would go on and on about placing “Tiny Classified Ads” in newspapers.  I never thought much of those ads until Google’s adoption of (essentially) little text ads next to search results led to their explosive growth.

Sometimes in business, the solution is simpler than you can imagine.

[转] The History of the Internet in a Nutshell

星期三, 12月 2nd, 2009

原文地址:http://sixrevisions.com/resources/the-history-of-the-internet-in-a-nutshell/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%2BSixRevisions%2B%28Six%2BRevisions%29&utm_content=Google%2BReader

If you’re reading this article, it’s likely that you spend a fair amount of time online. However, considering how much of an influence the Internet has in our daily lives, how many of us actually know the story of how it got its start?

Here’s a brief history of the Internet, including important dates, people, projects, sites, and other information that should give you at least a partial picture of what this thing we call the Internet really is, and where it came from.

The History of the Internet in a Nutshell

While the complete history of the Internet could easily fill a few books, this article should familiarize you with key milestones and events related to the growth and evolution of the Internet between 1969 to 2009.

1969: Arpanet

Arpanet

Arpanet was the first real network to run on packet switching technology (new at the time). On the October 29, 1969, computers at Stanford and UCLA connected for the first time. In effect, they were the first hosts on what would one day become the Internet.

The first message sent across the network was supposed to be “Login”, but reportedly, the link between the two colleges crashed on the letter “g”.

1969: Unix

Unix

Another major milestone during the 60’s was the inception of Unix: the operating system whose design heavily influenced that of Linux and FreeBSD (the operating systems most popular in today’s web servers/web hosting services).

1970: Arpanet network

An Arpanet network was established between Harvard, MIT, and BBN (the company that created the “interface message processor” computers used to connect to the network) in 1970.

1971: Email

Email

Email was first developed in 1971 by Ray Tomlinson, who also made the decision to use the “@” symbol to separate the user name from the computer name (which later on became the domain name).

1971: Project Gutenberg and eBooks

Project Gutenberg and eBooks

One of the most impressive developments of 1971 was the start of Project Gutenberg. Project Gutenberg, for those unfamiliar with the site, is a global effort to make books and documents in the public domain available electronically–for free–in a variety of eBook and electronic formats.

It began when Michael Hart gained access to a large block of computing time and came to the realization that the future of computers wasn’t in computing itself, but in the storage, retrieval and searching of information that, at the time, was only contained in libraries. He manually typed (no OCR at the time) the “Declaration of Independence” and launched Project Gutenberg to make information contained in books widely available in electronic form. In effect, this was the birth of the eBook.

1972: CYCLADES

France began its own Arpanet-like project in 1972, called CYCLADES. While Cyclades was eventually shut down, it did pioneer a key idea: the host computer should be responsible for data transmission rather than the network itself.

1973: The first trans-Atlantic connection and the popularity of emailing

Arpanet made its first trans-Atlantic connection in 1973, with the University College of London. During the same year, email accounted for 75% of all Arpanet network activity.

1974: The beginning of TCP/IP

The beginning of TCP/IP

1974 was a breakthrough year. A proposal was published to link Arpa-like networks together into a so-called “inter-network”, which would have no central control and would work around a transmission control protocol (which eventually became TCP/IP).

1975: The email client

With the popularity of emailing, the first modern email program was developed by John Vittal, a programmer at the University of Southern California in 1975. The biggest technological advance this program (called MSG) made was the addition of “Reply” and “Forward” functionality.

1977: The PC modem

The PC modem

1977 was a big year for the development of the Internet as we know it today. It’s the year the first PC modem, developed by Dennis Hayes and Dale Heatherington, was introduced and initially sold to computer hobbyists.

1978: The Bulletin Board System (BBS)

The first bulletin board system (BBS) was developed during a blizzard in Chicago in 1978.

1978: Spam is born

1978 is also the year that brought the first unsolicited commercial email message (later known as spam), sent out to 600 California Arpanet users by Gary Thuerk.

1979: MUD – The earliest form of multiplayer games

MUD - The earliest form of multiplayer games

The precursor to World of Warcraft and Second Life was developed in 1979, and was called MUD (short for MultiUser Dungeon). MUDs were entirely text-based virtual worlds, combining elements of role-playing games, interactive, fiction, and online chat.

1979: Usenet

1979 also ushered into the scene: Usenet, created by two graduate students. Usenet was an internet-based discussion system, allowing people from around the globe to converse about the same topics by posting public messages categorized by newsgroups.

1980: ENQUIRE software

The European Organization for Nuclear Research (better known as CERN) launched ENQUIRE (written by Tim Berners-Lee), a hypertext program that allowed scientists at the particle physics lab to keep track of people, software, and projects using hypertext (hyperlinks).

1982: The first emoticon

The first emoticon

While many people credit Kevin MacKenzie with the invention of the emoticon in 1979, it was Scott Fahlman in 1982 who proposed using :-) after a joke, rather than the original -) proposed by MacKenzie. The modern emoticon was born.

1983: Arpanet computers switch over to TCP/IP

January 1, 1983 was the deadline for Arpanet computers to switch over to the TCP/IP protocols developed by Vinton Cerf. A few hundred computers were affected by the switch. The name server was also developed in ‘83.

1984: Domain Name System (DNS)

Domain Name System (DNS)

The domain name system was created in 1984 along with the first Domain Name Servers (DNS). The domain name system was important in that it made addresses on the Internet more human-friendly compared to its numerical IP address counterparts. DNS servers allowed Internet users to type in an easy-to-remember domain name and then converted it to the IP address automatically.

1985: Virtual communities

1985 brought the development of The WELL (short for Whole Earth ‘Lectronic Link), one of the oldest virtual communities still in operation. It was developed by Stewart Brand and Larry Brilliant in February of ‘85. It started out as a community of the readers and writers of the Whole Earth Review and was an open but “remarkably literate and uninhibited intellectual gathering”. Wired Magazine once called The Well “The most influential online community in the world.

1986: Protocol wars

The so-called Protocol wars began in 1986. European countries at that time were pursuing the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI), while the United States was using the Internet/Arpanet protocol, which eventually won out.

1987: The Internet grows

By 1987, there were nearly 30,000 hosts on the Internet. The original Arpanet protocol had been limited to 1,000 hosts, but the adoption of the TCP/IP standard made larger numbers of hosts possible.

1988: IRC – Internet Relay Chat

IRC - Internet Relay Chat

Also in 1988, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) was first deployed, paving the way for real-time chat and the instant messaging programs we use today.

1988: First major malicious internet-based attack

One of the first major Internet worms was released in 1988. Referred to as “The Morris Worm”, it was written by Robert Tappan Morris and caused major interruptions across large parts of the Internet.

1989: AOL is launched

AOL is launched

When Apple pulled out of the AppleLink program in 1989, the project was renamed and America Online was born. AOL, still in existence today, later on made the Internet popular amongst the average internet users.

1989: The proposal for the World Wide Web

The Proposal for the World Wide Web

1989 also brought about the proposal for the World Wide Web, written by Tim Berners-Lee. It was originally published in the March issue of MacWorld, and then redistributed in May 1990. It was written to persuade CERN that a global hypertext system was in CERN’s best interest. It was originally called “Mesh”; the term “World Wide Web” was coined while Berners-Lee was writing the code in 1990.

1990: First commercial dial-up ISP

1990 also brought about the first commercial dial-up Internet provider, The World. The same year, Arpanet ceased to exist.

1990: World Wide Web protocols finished

The code for the World Wide Web was written by Tim Berners-Lee, based on his proposal from the year before, along with the standards for HTML, HTTP, and URLs.

1991: First web page created

First web page created

1991 brought some major innovations to the world of the Internet. The first web page was created and, much like the first email explained what email was, its purpose was to explain what the World Wide Web was.

1991: First content-based search protocol

Also in the same year, the first search protocol that examined file contents instead of just file names was launched, called Gopher.

1991: MP3 becomes a standard

Also, the MP3 file format was accepted as a standard in 1991. MP3 files, being highly compressed, later become a popular file format to share songs and entire albums via the internet.

1991: The first webcam

The first webcam

One of the more interesting developments of this era, though, was the first webcam. It was deployed at a Cambridge University computer lab, and its sole purpose was to monitor a particular coffee maker so that lab users could avoid wasted trips to an empty coffee pot.

1993: Mosaic – first graphical web browser for the general public

Mosaic - first graphical web browser for the general public

The first widely downloaded Internet browser, Mosaic, was released in 1993. While Mosaic wasn’t the first web browser, it is considered the first browser to make the Internet easily accessible to non-techies.

1993: Governments join in on the fun

In 1993, both the White House and the United Nations came online, marking the beginning of the .gov and .org domain names.

1994: Netscape Navigator

Netscape Navigator

Mosaic’s first big competitor, Netscape Navigator, was released the year following (1994).

1995: Commercialization of the internet

1995 is often considered the first year the web became commercialized. While there were commercial enterprises online prior to ‘95, there were a few key developments that happened that year. First, SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) encryption was developed by Netscape, making it safer to conduct financial transactions (like credit card payments) online.

In addition, two major online businesses got their start the same year. The first sale on “Echo Bay” was made that year. Echo Bay later became eBay. Amazon.com also started in 1995, though it didn’t turn a profit for six years, until 2001.

1995: Geocities, the Vatican goes online, and JavaScript

Other major developments that year included the launch of Geocities (which officially closed down on October 26, 2009).

The Vatican also went online for the first time.

Java and JavaScript (originally called LiveScript by its creator, Brendan Eich, and deployed as part of the Netscape Navigator browser – see comments for explanation) was first introduced to the public in 1995. ActiveX was launched by Microsoft the following year.

1996: First web-based (webmail) service

First web-based (webmail) service

In 1996, HoTMaiL (the capitalized letters are an homage to HTML), the first webmail service, was launched.

1997: The term “weblog” is coined

While the first blogs had been around for a few years in one form or another, 1997 was the first year the term “weblog” was used.

1998: First new story to be broken online instead of traditional media

In 1998, the first major news story to be broken online was the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal (also referred to as “Monicagate” among other nicknames), which was posted on The Drudge Report after Newsweek killed the story.

1998: Google!

Google!

Google went live in 1998, revolutionizing the way in which people find information online.

1998: Internet-based file-sharing gets its roots

Internet-based file-sharing starts to become popular

In 1998 as well, Napster launched, opening up the gates to mainstream file-sharing of audio files over the internet.

1999: SETI@home project

1999 is the year when one of the more interesting projects ever brought online: the SETI@home project, launched. The project has created the equivalent of a giant supercomputer by harnessing the computing power of more than 3 million computers worldwide, using their processors whenever the screensaver comes on, indicating that the computer is idle. The program analyzes radio telescope data to look for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence.

2000: The bubble bursts

2000 was the year of the dotcom collapse, resulting in huge losses for legions of investors. Hundreds of companies closed, some of which had never turned a profit for their investors. The NASDAQ, which listed a large number of tech companies affected by the bubble, peaked at over 5,000, then lost 10% of its value in a single day, and finally hit bottom in October of 2002.

2001: Wikipedia is launched

Wikipedia is launched

With the dotcom collapse still going strong, Wikipedia launched in 2001, one of the websites that paved the way for collective web content generation/social media.

2003: VoIP goes mainstream

In 2003: Skype is released to the public, giving a user-friendly interface to Voice over IP calling.

2003: MySpace becomes the most popular social network

Also in 2003, MySpace opens up its doors. It later grew to be the most popular social network at one time (thought it has since been overtaken by Facebook).

2003: CAN-SPAM Act puts a lid on unsolicited emails

Another major advance in 2003 was the signing of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, better known as the CAN-SPAM Act.

2004: Web 2.0

Though coined in 1999 by Darcy DiNucci, the term “Web 2.0″, referring to websites and Rich Internet Applications (RIA) that are highly interactive and user-driven became popular around 2004. During the first Web 2.0 conference, John Batelle and Tim O’Reilly described the concept of “the Web as a Platform“: software applications built to take advantage of internet connectivity, moving away from the desktop (which has downsides such as operating system dependency and lack of interoperability).

2004: Social Media and Digg

The term “social media”, believed to be first used by Chris Sharpley, was coined in the same year that “Web 2.0″ became a mainstream concept. Social media–sites and web applications that allow its users to create and share content and to connect with one another–started around this period.

Social Media and Digg

Digg, a social news site, launched on November of 2004, paving the way for sites such as Reddit, Mixx, and Yahoo! Buzz. Digg revolutionized traditional means of generating and finding web content, democratically promoting news and web links that are reviewed and voted on by a community.

2004: “The” Facebook open to college students

"The" Facebook open to college students

Facebook launched in 2004, though at the time it was only open to college students and was called “The Facebook”; later on, “The” was dropped from the name, though the URL http://www.thefacebook.com still works.

2005: YouTube – streaming video for the masses

YouTube launched in 2005, bringing free online video hosting and sharing to the masses.

2006: Twitter gets twittering

Twitter launched in 2006. It was originally going to be called twittr (inspired by Flickr); the first Twitter message was “just setting up my twttr”.

2007: Major move to place TV shows online

Major move to place TV shows online

Hulu was first launched in 2007, a joint venture between ABC, NBC, and Fox to make popular TV shows available to watch online.

2007: The iPhone and the Mobile Web

The Mobile Web

The biggest innovation of 2007 was almost certainly the iPhone, which was almost wholly responsible for renewed interest in mobile web applications and design.

2008: “Internet Election”

The first “Internet election” took place in 2008 with the U.S. Presidential election. It was the first year that national candidates took full advantage of all the Internet had to offer. Hillary Clinton jumped on board early with YouTube campaign videos. Virtually every candidate had a Facebook page or a Twitter feed, or both.

Ron Paul

Ron Paul set a new fundraising record by raising $4.3 million in a single day through online donations, and then beat his own record only weeks later by raising $4.4 million in a single day.

The 2008 elections placed the Internet squarely at the forefront of politics and campaigning, a trend that is unlikely to change any time in the near future.

2009: ICANN policy changes

2009 brought about one of the biggest changes to come to the Internet in a long time when the U.S. relaxed its control over ICANN, the official naming body of the Internet (they’re the organization in charge of registering domain names).

The Future?

Where is the future of the Internet headed? Share your opinions in the comments section.

Sources and Further Reading

Related Content

About the Author

Cameron Chapman is a professional web and graphic designer with over 6 years of experience in the industry. She’s also written for numerous blogs such as Smashing Magazine and Mashable. You can find her personal web presence at Cameron Chapman On Writing. If you’d like to connect with her, check her out on Twitter.

Airlines and Social Media: Carriers turn to Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and online blogs

星期六, 09月 12th, 2009
It is early days for social media as a B2C tool. businesses cannot help but seek to tap into what may prove to be a lucrative flow. low cost airlines tend to be the innovators in this area, but many full service airlines have strongly bought into the Social Media sites too.

It is early days for social media as a B2C tool. The scale of activity at the non-commercial level is however such that businesses cannot help but seek to tap into what may prove to be a lucrative flow. As always, low cost airlines tend to be the innovators in this area, but – perhaps in a sign of the changed times – many full service airlines have strongly bought into the Social Media sites too.

Today Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and online blogs, offer largely unexplored new advertising and promotion platforms.

In principle, these sites enable airlines (and companies in general) to instantaneously and cheaply promote their product and brand, get the online community involved and motivated to travel, specifically target key market segments and develop brand loyalty to the carrier. It is also a way for carriers to promote word-of-mouth advertising, which is the single largest influencer when it comes to making travel decision, and, ultimately, boost revenue levels.

But much of the activity is experimental – and may be ephemeral. It can also be dangerous.

JetBlue and United Airlines using Twitter as a revenue-boosting business platform

In the US, JetBlue Airways and United Airlines have taken the Twitter phenomenon to the next level, introducing Twitter-exclusive promotions through the social networking site.

This strategy presents airlines with a new and innovative way to boost load factors, and hence the carriers’ bottom line, at the last minute, while rewarding their followers and boosting brand awareness.

It also (temporarily) differentiates JetBlue and United from the numerous other airlines, both LCCs and network carriers, who have established Twitter accounts of late. However, the majority of airlines are merely following the Twitter trend and have little more than press release information on their Twitter pages. In this respect they are not effectively using the site to its full potential.

‘Twares’ and ‘cheeps’ proving successful

The Twitter promotions, labelled “twares” by United and “cheeps” by JetBlue, are available for the airlines’ Twitter followers and those who sign up to receive the airlines´ updates via the site, and are usually available for a very limited period time, sometimes for as little as an hour or two.

JetBlue has established a new account, “JetBlueCheeps,” that have posted deals each Monday morning since Jul-2009 covering the following two weekends, with the carrier recently offering a USD9 one way Burbank-Las Vegas fare.

According to JetBlue, “by promoting the Cheeps through Twitter, we give the already spontaneous audience of Twitter users a chance to grab great last-minute fares”.

United Airlines, meanwhile, offers “twares”, through its main Twitter account, with the carrier stating, “we try to surprise our customers once or twice a week by offering them special, Twitter-only fares”.

The strategy – strike fast, strike low

The carrier, which started the programme in May-2009, added that “twares are all about surprising our customers with low fares for a very, very limited time. [They] sell extremely fast because the prices are unbeatable.”

Both airlines have had some success with the programme, although the extent of the benefits is still largely unknown due to the newness of the programmes. The benefits are also expected to increase as Twitter matures and the functionality of the system improves.  However, yield management can quickly be undermined – or changed irreversibly – if expectations of ultra-cheap last minute fare availability grows.

Facebook - opportunities exist with the world’s most used social network

Airlines are also embracing Facebook, the most used social network by worldwide monthly active users (there are currently more than 250 million registered users). Like Twitter, numerous carriers have Facebook profiles, but a few carriers stand out in the way they use the site to their advantage.

American Airlines and Virgin America using Facebook as an alternate booking platform
For example, American Airlines added a new “fare-finding” feature to its Travel Bag application within Facebook on 31-Jul-09, enabling Facebook users to find the lowest American Airlines fares for their desired trips using a real time search. If users then opt to book a trip, they are taken to AA.com to proceed with the booking.

The application also makes it easy for users to share travel experiences, reviews, comments and travel photos with friends and other Travel Bag users. Users are also able to personalise and plan up to three trips at one time. Potential passenger can name the trips, set the departure and return cities and dates, and share their trip searches with friends in their network. Each planned trip is stored automatically on Facebook until the user decides to delete it or the departure date passes.

This move also provides a host of opportunities for American Airlines to gain an insight into its customer base, with the carrier stating it is “seeking to differentiate and segment” its passengers and “trying to learn more about them, what their habits are, why they buy and when they buy.”

Another carrier which has embraced Facebook and its ability as a tool to more effectively engage its customers is Virgin America. Through its Facebook page, passengers are able to click links to search flights and check flight statuses, but features Fan Videos, Customer reviews, Discussion Board, Company Information, and Information on the Elevate Loyalty Programme. It also has links to the carrier’s Twitter and YouTube Profiles.

Benefiting from the power of YouTube

Numerous carriers are also using the visual format of YouTube to their advantage.

Looking at Qantas as an example, the Qantas YouTube channel has seen over 45,500 channel views since its launch on 14-Feb-2006. Other stats include 3,526 views of its newly relaunched ‘I Still Call Australia Home’ Advert, in the first three days since its launch, and 87,152 views for its ‘Painting of the first Qantas A380’ video.

Air New Zealand ads become a YouTube success

Air New Zealand’s Jul-2009 ‘Bare essentials of safety from Air New Zealand’ and ‘Nothing to Hide’ videos have also highlighted the power of YouTube.

The ‘Nothing to Hide’ TV commercial, which features eight body-painted Air New Zealanders including CEO, Rob Fyfe, was designed to highlight the transparency of Air New Zealand´s all-inclusive domestic airfares, with the message that, unlike competitor airlines, what you see is what you get. It has had over 3.8 million views on YouTube since it was launched on 10-May-09.

The safety video, which has been seen over 4.6 million times on YouTube, has body-painted cabin crew and pilots delivering the in-flight safety briefing to customers travelling on B737 domestic jet services. The video was the third most viewed video globally on YouTube in the week of its launch, and was the most viewed New Zealand travel video of all time on YouTube, surpassing the ‘Nothing to Hide television’ commercial which placed in second place.

Air New Zealand General Manager Marketing, Steve Bayliss, stated the “genuine, fun and engaging approach taken by Air New Zealand to its in-flight safety briefing had clearly resonated with both customers and media”, with the carrier  “absolutely stunned by the massive international interest in our in-flight safety briefing”.

JetBlue uses Flickr

Flickr, a photo sharing community, is another Social Media stream used by carriers. JetBlue is again actively involved in this medium, and currently has 3,400 items, including photos and videos.

Members of the JetBlue Flickr group can comment on each others’ photos and can add each other as friends, with members including customers and employees of JetBlue. The JetBlue Flickr Group also has an active discussion board, enabling members to ask questions, give opinions and offer suggestions to other members.

Southwest leading the blogging trend

A number of airlines are also embracing the blog, with Southwest probably the best example of a carrier effectively using this format, with its ‘Nuts about Southwest’ blog, which was started two years ago and has recently been revised.

The blog is regularly updated and features discussions on a range of topics, with CEO, Gary Kelly, having a regular featured blog. The blog also features podcasts, the carrier’s latest News, polls, Video Blogs and Flickr Group pictures, among other regular features.

Southwest Manager Online Relationships & Special Projects, Brian Lusk, stated the blog has “played an important role in corporate decisions”, from changes in Southwest´s seating procedure to when it opens its inventory for reservations. The blog involves approximately 30 Southwest employees and gets above 60,000 unique visitors per month.

The site has also played an important role in the carrier’s ability to react to negative publicity events, including its Mar-2008 safety hiccup.

Targeted network sites provide access to key market segments

A number of carriers are also using network sites to specifically target and develop key market segments. One natural approach is to target younger age categories, with disposable income and whose usage of the media is broadest.

Examples include, but are not limited to:

AirTran: AirTran reaches college students by positing videos on collegehumor.com. The LCC has also set up airtranu.com, a website aimed at college students which offers students between 18 and 22 years of age with standby flights for USD68 for short haul and USD99 for long haul segments. The carrier stated it has had success in reaching this target audience through this sort of viral marketing.

Lufthansa: Lufthansa has also launched ‘GenFlyLounge.com’, a social networking site designed specially for students, with the carrier recognising the importance of social networking sites for the younger generations.

The site is a dedicated airline-sponsored social network for college students and offers enrolled student-members to compare notes on travel experiences and destinations and buy discounted student airfares on Lufthansa.

Describing the site, Lufthansa stated GenFlyLounge.com enables students to “Network, meet and connect with students who love to travel internationally.

Then there is the opportunity for the airline’s site to be a B2B meeting point on non-travel matters:

KLM: KLM has developed several of its own social networks, including KLM Club China and KLM Club Africa, which are virtual business communities offering passenger an “instant business network, where you can meet valuable contacts and share your experiences”. KLM describes the Clubs as follows:

KLM Club China: “KLM Club China is the first in a range of exclusive business communities. A virtual club bringing you into contact with others doing business in and with China. The heart of Club China is the online platform. Here you can, for instance, create your own business network. Enabling you to attain valuable contacts, share your experience and learn from other experiences”.

KLM Club Africa: “We are pleased to announce Club Africa, a new form of business community for business travelers with one aim in common: to successfully conduct business in and with Africa. Club Africa is essentially an instant business network in Africa. It will enable you to attain valuable contacts quickly and easily, and find mutual inspiration with new ideas and business proposals”.

KLM also has Flying Blue Golf, which allows golfers to comment on their golf scores and courses they have played, use KLM frequent flyer points to buy golfing equipment and book golfing trips on KLM.

Another functional type is more directly travel related and designed more directly to encourage ticket sales:

Virgin Atlantic: Virgin Atlantic launched ‘Vtravelled’ on 23-Jun-09, a dedicated travel portal which aims to tap into the `inspirational´ travel market and allows visitors to organise and share their travel plans.

SAS: Another carrier using social networking sites to attract specific target markets is Scandinavian Airlines, which established a website dedicated to the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender/transsexual community, aimed at attracting this high-income demographic group.

On the site, the airline´s gay staff provide tips on the best restaurants, venues and events in Stockholm and Copenhagen. The carrier has also partnered with several organisations and publishers so the site can offer gay maps, gay guides and an events calendar that is updated daily for both cities. Although this site has yet to become truly a social network, the potential for such websites is huge.

eBay auctions gather interest

JetBlue, in Sep-2008, also used eBay to its benefit, with the LCC auctioning more than 300 return services and six vacation packages on eBay, with opening bids of USD0.05 and USD0.10. Despite the low starting price, in most cases the final price was around the same price as the actual website price. However, in many cases, eBay buyers paid considerably more than the publicly advertised prices!

The auction not only provided another sales platform for the LCC, but produced valuable word-of-mouth advertising for the LCC, with the auction gathering interest from a large number of bidders and watchers.

Jumping on the iPhone bandwagon

Although not actually a form of social networking, a new and increasingly popular phenomenon of late relates to the iPhone application.

Air Canada in mid-Aug-2009 launched an Apple iPhone/iTouch application allowing travellers to retrieve electronic boarding passes, track flight information in real-time, receive notification of itinerary changes and obtain other details about the carrier´s services.

Other carriers with iPhone applications include easyJet, Qantas, American Airlines and Delta Air Lines.

..but not always a good thing

However, there are negatives with external social networking, considering the public nature and significant online presence of these formats.

An example of this occurred at the end of 2008, when Virgin Atlantic fired 13 flight attendants for criticising the airline’s flight safety standards and describing its passengers as “chavs” on Facebook.

At the time, the carrier stated, “there is a time and a place for Facebook. But there is no justification for it to be used as a sounding board for staff of any company to criticise the very passengers who pay their salaries.”

British Airways had a similar problem, with several employees describing some passengers as “smelly” and “annoying” in Facebook postings, an example of another Facebook public relations negative.

It also highlights a need for internal awareness and communication by airline management on the importance of these new forms of media.

Passengers are also increasingly expressing their anger, predominantly related to flight delays and customer services, on social networking sites, which provides passengers with a more immediate and broad audience to express their frustrations, rather than the previous available option – the post flight complaint email or letter. And, it is usually frustrated passengers, rather than happy passengers, who use these sites.

So, airlines also need to be able to manage the potential negativity which may arise from some of the content posted on these sites, whether it is from jaded passengers and/or staff. Importantly, by entering into unedited social media space, the airline loses a degree of control of the PR message that is produced.

Only starting to see the benefits – and the pitfalls

Through well developed social networking sites, airlines are able to communicate on a more personal level with potential and existing customers. However, as yet, the full potential of these sites has not been developed – and may in fact prove to be much overstated, or alternatively, have the power to transform some marketing strategies. Most probably, as the media evolves, airlines will come to understand how to integrate its usage into wider marketing and sales strategies.

For social media marketing approaches to be truly effective, they need to be clearly and effectively aligned with the carrier’s business strategy, rather than being seen merely as a trend or a gimmick. Only when this is done can carriers realise the revenue potential from these sites.

There is also scope for these sites to be used in a much more effective manner as a customer service tool, with these platform actually able to help counteract negative publicity (rather than being a forum creating such publicity), although this has not, as yet, been developed.

But, once airlines enter into these new, uncontrolled and experimental areas, there needs to be a recognition that the company:public interface becomes a whole different environment – and one over which the airline has only very limited control.